A Proverbs 5 Warning: Shannon Sharpe Denies Sexual Assault Allegations in $50 Million Lawsuit

Apr 23

Beyond the headlines lies a battle over reputation, power, and truth—one that demands spiritual discernment.

Written By Tonya Dawkins // EEW Magazine Online

Update: In a statement released on April 24, 2025, Shannon Sharpe announced that he is "electing to step aside temporarily" from his duties at ESPN, while affirming that "the relationship in question was 100% consensual.”

“For the lips of a forbidden woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil, but in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword.” — Proverbs 5:3-4 (ESV)

Scripture warns that temptation’s allure can lead to downfall, a lesson now testing Shannon Sharpe’s legacy.

A high-stakes legal battle is underway centering on Pro Football Hall of Famer and ESPN analyst Shannon Sharpe, as a $50 million civil lawsuit alleging sexual assault and battery unfolds in Nevada. Filed on April 22, 2025, the case pits Sharpe, 56, against Gabriella Zuniga, 21, in a clash over reputation, truth, and accountability that demands discernment from those watching.

Zuniga was 19 when she met Sharpe, then 54, at a Los Angeles gym in 2023, according to court documents obtained by EEW Magazine. She claims their relationship, initially consensual, turned abusive, with Sharpe raping her in October 2024 and January 2025 and secretly recording their sexual encounters. An audio clip, released by Zuniga’s attorney, Tony Buzbee, allegedly captures Sharpe threatening to choke her if she accused him of manipulation.

Sharpe has denied the allegations, labeling the lawsuit a “shakedown” in a video posted on X. “My career is built on real talk and honesty,” he said, vowing to clear his name. His attorney, Lanny Davis, argues the audio was “selectively edited” to distort a consensual relationship and calls the lawsuit a bid to exploit Sharpe’s wealth.

To bolster Sharpe’s defense, his legal team released explicit text messages allegedly sent by Zuniga between October 2023 and January 2025. One, dated October 7, 2023, references a “dog collar” for intimate use; another, from January 1, 2025, jokes about “$25k for each cheek” as payment for sexual acts. Davis contends these messages show consensual behavior, undermining Zuniga’s claims.

Zuniga’s lawsuit also points to a September 2024 incident when Sharpe was inadvertently heard engaging in sexual activity during a viral Instagram Live session. Though Zuniga was not involved, she alleges the audio, heard by millions, humiliated her by exposing Sharpe’s private behavior during their relationship, deepening her sense of betrayal and emotional distress. Sharpe’s team has not addressed this claim but confirmed he offered Zuniga $10 million to settle before the lawsuit, which she declined.

Sharpe’s influence as a Black sports icon—through ESPN’s First Take, Nightcap with Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson, and the Club Shay Shay podcast—lends gravity to the public response. His candid style has earned him trust, particularly among Black audiences who value integrity and representation. The allegations now jeopardize that bond. “This makes me pray for truth,” said Tamika W., a 38-year-old Atlanta mother. “Sharpe’s been a role model. It’s a reminder to teach our sons about wise choices.”

Public reaction is split. ESPN’s decision to keep Sharpe on air has drawn mixed views, with no formal statement from the network. Keisha L., 45, from Chicago, supports the approach: “Let the legal process play out. We can’t rush to judgment.” Brianna T., 29, from Houston, disagrees: “Allegations this serious warrant a step back. Ignoring them sends the wrong message.”

Loretta M., a 52-year-old grandmother from Charlotte told EEW, “The dangers of giving into temptation is a hard lesson, but one our Black men, young and old, need to learn.”

On social media, some cite Zuniga’s text messages as evidence of consent, while others argue her claims deserve a full hearing. Zuniga initially filed as “Jane Doe,” but Sharpe’s team named her in court filings, a move some online commentators called unethical.

Legal experts say the case’s outcome may rest on the text messages’ authenticity, the audio clip’s context, and the relationship’s timeline. Currently, Sharpe says he is preparing a defamation countersuit, signaling a protracted fight.

For EEW Magazine’s readers, the controversy is a sobering reminder: public status offers no shield from accountability. Furthermore, personal choices—private or exposed—shape lives and communities. As the truth unfolds, the hope is for justice, integrity, and, where needed, healing.

More on EEW Magazine:

Featured